{"id":1033,"date":"2024-02-29T12:56:00","date_gmt":"2024-02-29T17:56:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.protectingamericanvalues.com\/?p=1033"},"modified":"2024-02-29T12:56:01","modified_gmt":"2024-02-29T17:56:01","slug":"ex-divorce-lawyers-testimony-complicates-willis-wade-controversy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.protectingamericanvalues.com\/ex-divorce-lawyers-testimony-complicates-willis-wade-controversy\/","title":{"rendered":"Ex-divorce lawyer\u2019s testimony complicates Willis, Wade controversy"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The details about Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis&#8217;s (D) relationship with the special prosecutor in charge of the former president&#8217;s Georgia 2019 election interference investigation was made more complicated following a second round of testimony by an important witness this week.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The ambiguities surrounding the timeline that surrounded Willis and Nathan Wade&#8217;s relationship is particularly problematic, as the two attorneys claiming that they didn&#8217;t start meeting until after Willis was hired by Wade to supervise Trump&#8217;s case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But the witnesses in the probe of their relationship have said that they were not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Terrence Bradley, who was the former law attorney and partner of Wade Bradley, reminisced about very little of his own information in the witness stand on Tuesday, noting a plethora of times that he was unable to recall the details of the things Wade spoke to the former lawyer about Willis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But his sometimes tense testimony gave a hefty dose of doubt, and further muddy the waters surrounding the relationship, which could result in both prosecutors removed from the trial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The defense wants to block Willis, Wade and the entire Fulton County district attorney&#8217;s office from continuing to pursue the broad racketeering investigation against Trump and a number of his allies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The core of their argument lies the timing in Willis and Wade&#8217;s relationship which defense lawyers say started before Wade&#8217;s appointment.&nbsp;The defense asserts that Willis has profited from Wade&#8217;s work through trips they took together when they were dating.&nbsp;Wade got hired November 2021.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Both prosecutors maintain that they started dating in the early 2022&#8217;sfollowing Wade&#8217;s hireand then broke up in the summer of 2023. This was just before the indictment of Trump was pronounced, claiming there isn&#8217;t any conflict.&nbsp;But this week&#8217;s testimony has cast the timeline of their relationship further into doubt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ashleigh Merchant, who is an attorney for the 2020 Trump Campaign the operative Michael Roman, who first openly made public allegations of the relationship provided Bradley in the form of a silver bullet for defense texts that show the former law firm partner of Bradley confirming the timeline of the defense.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The messages placed Bradley in a tense situation as Merchant and others tried to force him to confess to a felony of discussing the conversations with his client Wade.&nbsp;If he was summoned to testify at an earlier trial, Bradley at first mentioned attorney-client privilege, a way to not answer questions. He was then forced to witness stand on Tuesday, after a judge ruled that the privilege did not apply.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>With Wade standing just feet away and sometimes shaking his head Bradley was careful to follow the rules of protecting his license to practice law and a former friend -even as defense lawyers tried to personalize the situation.&nbsp;In one instance the attorney was asked if Bradley often made up stories about his acquaintances, suggesting that the lawyer was either lying regarding the relationship&#8217;s timeline or was lying about Wade.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the text messages, Merchant said, Bradley said that the romance between the prosecutors &#8220;absolutely&#8221; began before Willis appointed Wade.&nbsp;Bradley said he could &#8220;see that in the text messages.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;And do you remember me asking what they would doshould they take me down?&nbsp;You said that they would refuse to admit that or not?'&#8221; Merchant pressed on with an argument from the state which the judge ruled against.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;That&#8217;s written in the book.&nbsp;Sure,&#8221; he replied.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If asked questions regarding the conversation Bradley claimed that his remarks are &#8220;speculation.&#8221; Trump attorney Steve Sadow pushed back on the assertion, asking &#8220;why in the heck&#8221; that he would speculate on the subject.&nbsp;After some exchanges, Bradley replied he had &#8220;no answer&#8221; for why he was speculating.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;What you want the court to believe and you want the rest of us to believe, is that for some unknown reason, upon being asked a direct question about when the relationship started, you decided on your own to simply speculate and put it down in a text message as opposed to putting down what you actually knew,&#8221; Sadow stated she claimed that Bradley knows the date Willis and Wade started dating, but didn&#8217;t wish to be a witness in court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Despite Bradley&#8217;s protest on the stand as a witness, his messages are in line with the testimony in a previous hearing by a former acquaintance of Willis.&nbsp;Robin Yeartie, who met Willis in the college years she testified earlier in the month Willis and Wade started their relationship in the year 2019 following an unofficial court hearing -which was a few years prior to when the prosecutors stated under the oath.&nbsp;Willis denied Yeartie&#8217;s testimony.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But, at the conclusion of Tuesday&#8217;s court hearing, Bradley called his own credibility to be in doubt.&nbsp;When questioned by Richard Rice, an attorney representing the defendant Bob Cheeley Bradley stated that he couldn&#8217;t recall if he&#8217;d ever committed a lie to Merchant Roman&#8217;s defense lawyer in their letters.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t recall ever whether any of it was a lie or not,&#8221; the man said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Tuesday hearing won&#8217;t be the last decision on the issue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The judge Scott McAfee will hear arguments from the lawyers on Friday afternoon, and then decide.&nbsp;He has previously stated that the allegations made against Willis as well as Wade &#8220;could result&#8221; in their exclusion if there is evidence of the existence of an &#8220;actual conflict of interest or the appearance of one.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>McAfee said he might be looking at additional evidence on Friday should it be necessary, such as the analysis of phone data provided by the defense suggest Wade frequented Willis&#8217;s residence dozens of times, often late into the nightbefore that their relationship started.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The office of the district attorney contests the authenticity of the information, however the judge stated that he&#8217;ll take it into consideration in the event that he believes he has to do so following the arguments on Friday.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The details about Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis&#8217;s (D) relationship with the special prosecutor in charge of the former president&#8217;s Georgia 2019 election interference investigation was made more complicated following a second round of testimony by an important witness this week. The ambiguities surrounding the timeline that surrounded Willis and Nathan Wade&#8217;s relationship is [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1035,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[5],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.protectingamericanvalues.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1033"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.protectingamericanvalues.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.protectingamericanvalues.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.protectingamericanvalues.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.protectingamericanvalues.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1033"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.protectingamericanvalues.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1033\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1034,"href":"https:\/\/www.protectingamericanvalues.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1033\/revisions\/1034"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.protectingamericanvalues.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media\/1035"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.protectingamericanvalues.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1033"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.protectingamericanvalues.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1033"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.protectingamericanvalues.com\/api\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1033"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}